The National Museum in Gdańsk (historically Danzig) is one of Poland’s oldest museums, formed through the merger of the Municipal Museum (1870) and the Museum of Decorative Arts (1881). Its origins trace back to the collection of Jacob Kabrun (1759–1814), which includes thousands of European paintings, drawings, and engravings from the late 15th to early 19th century.

The museum’s ceramics collection dates back to the late 19th century, when efforts began to establish a dedicated Museum of Decorative Arts. In 1881, Gdańsk collector Ludwig Garbe sold 433 objects to the museum, including around 60 pieces of Delftware. By World War II, the collection had grown to approximately 190 Delft ceramics, but many were lost during the war, leaving only about half surviving. Due to missing documentation from the German period, these figures remain estimates.
Despite these losses, the collection has continued to grow through purchases and donations, bringing the museum’s Delftware holdings to approximately 130 objects, alongside a significant collection of Dutch wall tiles.

The current permanent exhibition presents a selection of Delftware and tiles, including a set of large vases and covers marked LVE and a 17th-century panel by Jan van Oort. Archaeological excavations in Gdańsk have uncovered numerous Delftware fragments, particularly from De Drie Posteleyne Astonne during Gerrit Kam’s ownership (1679–1700)—a factory richly represented in the museum’s collection.
The significance of Delftware in Gdańsk reflects the city’s deep historical ties with the Netherlands. As a major trade hub, Gdańsk played a crucial role in Dutch-Baltic commerce, influencing architecture and decorative arts.
Plans are underway to expand the exhibition, allowing for a more in-depth presentation of the collection.


























Among its many treasures, the museum houses an impressive collection of Delftware. This collection was originally part of the Art Industry Museum. The origins of the Art Industry Museum date back to 1876, initiated by Professor Lorentz Dietrichson and antiquarian Nicolay Nicolaysen. Founded by the state, it was one of Norway’s first museums and among the earliest art industry museums in Europe. This initiative was likely driven by Norway’s desire to establish itself as an independent nation with a rich cultural identity.










Finally in the autumn of 1650, the ruling of the Court of Holland handed down to the effect that Willem could produce wares with new inventions but not in the manner of porcelain. The last judgment, that of the High Court, is not known; possibly a settlement was reached in the end. This outcome had as result that Willem Verstraeten continued making faience, but at first without the Chinese full decoration, since he had stated in several court cases that the Chinese decoration was the main characteristic of Hollandts porceleyn. Instead of the Chinese decoration he focussed on a more Italian style pattern.